Recommended Thermal Rate Coefficients for the C + H$_3^+$ Reaction and Some Astrochemical Implications
S. Vissapragada, C. F. Buzard, K. A. Miller, A. P. O'Connor, N. de, Ruette, X. Urbain, and D. W. Savin

TL;DR
This study provides experimentally derived thermal rate coefficients for the C + H$_3^+$ reaction, demonstrating their impact on astrochemical models and highlighting the importance of accurate rate data for predicting molecular abundances.
Contribution
The paper introduces experimentally obtained thermal rate coefficients for C + H$_3^+$, replacing the commonly used Arrhenius-Kooij fit with a more versatile formula, improving astrochemical modeling accuracy.
Findings
At higher temperatures, predicted abundances vary by up to a factor of 2.
Using precise rate coefficients reduces abundance prediction uncertainties.
No significant abundance differences at 10 K despite new rate data.
Abstract
We have incorporated our experimentally derived thermal rate coefficients for C + H forming CH and CH into a commonly used astrochemical model. We find that the Arrhenius-Kooij equation typically used in chemical models does not accurately fit our data and use instead a more versatile fitting formula. At a temperature of 10 K and a density of 10 cm, we find no significant differences in the predicted chemical abundances, but at higher temperatures of 50, 100, and 300 K we find up to factor of 2 changes. Additionally, we find that the relatively small error on our thermal rate coefficients, , significantly reduces the uncertainties on the predicted abundances compared to those obtained using the currently implemented Langevin rate coefficient with its estimated factor of 2 uncertainty.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
