A large difference in the progenitor masses of active and passive galaxies in the EAGLE simulation
Bart Clauwens, Marijn Franx, Joop Schaye

TL;DR
This study uses the EAGLE simulation to examine galaxy progenitor mass histories, revealing significant differences between active and passive galaxies that impact the accuracy of the cumulative number density matching method.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the cumulative number density method must be applied separately to active and passive galaxies due to their distinct mass growth histories, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
Passive and active galaxies have different median mass histories.
The difference persists even for central galaxies.
Main progenitors at z=2 span two orders of magnitude in stellar mass.
Abstract
Cumulative number density matching of galaxies is a method to observationally connect descendent galaxies to their typical main progenitors at higher redshifts and thereby to assess the evolution of galaxy properties. The accuracy of this method is limited due to galaxy merging and scatter in the stellar mass growth history of individual galaxies. Behroozi et al. (2013) have introduced a refinement of the method, based on abundance matching of observed galaxies to the Bolshoi dark-matter-only simulation. The EAGLE cosmological hydro-simulation is well suited to test this method, because it reproduces the observed evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function and the passive fraction. We find agreement with the Behroozi et al. (2013) method for the complete sample of main progenitors of z = 0 galaxies, but we also find a strong dependence on the current star formation rate. Passive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
