The logic of Turing progressions
Eduardo Hermo Reyes, Joost J. Joosten

TL;DR
This paper introduces a logic that precisely characterizes the relationships between various Turing progressions based on different consistency notions, establishing soundness and completeness within an arithmetical framework.
Contribution
It presents a new logic that captures all relations between Turing progressions under natural consistency notions, with proven arithmetical soundness and completeness.
Findings
Logic exactly characterizes relations between Turing progressions
Proven arithmetical soundness and completeness of the logic
Defines the Formalized Turing progressions (FTP) interpretation
Abstract
Turing progressions arise by iteratedly adding consistency statements to a base theory. Different notions of consistency give rise to different Turing progressions. In this paper we present a logic that generates exactly all relations that hold between these different Turing progressions given a particular set of natural consistency notions. Thus, the presented logic is proven to arithmetically sound and complete for a natural interpretation, named the \emph{Formalized Turing progressions} (FTP) interpretation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
