Spectro-timing study of GX 339-4 in a hard intermediate state
F. Fuerst (1), V. Grinberg (2), J. A. Tomsick (3), M. Bachetti (4), S., E. Boggs (3), M. Brightman (1), F. E. Christensen (5), W. W. Craig (3,6), P., Gandhi (7), B. Grefenstette (1), C. J. Hailey (8), F. A. Harrison (1), K. K., Madsen (1), M. L. Parker (9), K. Pottschmidt (10

TL;DR
This study analyzes NuSTAR data of GX 339-4 during a hard intermediate state, revealing spectral and timing evolution, including a correlation between QPO frequency and spectral softening, challenging existing models of accretion physics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed spectral and timing analysis of GX 339-4 in a specific state, highlighting discrepancies with current theoretical models of QPOs and accretion disk structure.
Findings
QPO frequency increases from 0.68 to 1.05 Hz as spectrum softens.
Inner disk radius remains around 9 gravitational radii throughout the observation.
Current models cannot fully explain the observed QPOs and disk radii without assuming an unlikely black hole mass.
Abstract
We present an analysis of NuSTAR observations of a hard intermediate state of the transient black hole GX 339-4 taken in January 2015. As the source softened significantly over the course of the 1.3 d-long observation we split the data into 21 sub-sets and find that the spectrum of all of them can be well described by a power-law continuum with an additional relativistically blurred reflection component. The photon index increases from ~1.69 to ~1.77 over the course of the observation. The accretion disk is truncated at around 9 gravitational radii in all spectra. We also perform timing analysis on the same 21 individual data sets, and find a strong type-C quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO), which increase in frequency from ~0.68 to ~1.05 Hz with time. The frequency change is well correlated with the softening of the spectrum. We discuss possible scenarios for the production of the QPO…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
