Balanced Ranking Mechanisms
Debasis Mishra, Tridib Sharma

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new auction mechanism that is symmetric, incentive compatible, budget-balanced, and highly likely to allocate to the highest valued agent, demonstrating the limits of efficiency in such settings.
Contribution
It constructs a novel mechanism that is symmetric, incentive compatible, budget-balanced, and nearly always allocates to the top bidder, showing the boundaries of possible outcomes in this model.
Findings
Allocates to highest valued agent with over 99% probability when at least 14 agents are present
Mechanism is symmetric, incentive compatible, and ex-post individually rational
Proves the mechanism's optimality within a restricted class of ranking mechanisms
Abstract
In the private values single object auction model, we construct a satisfactory mechanism - a symmetric, dominant strategy incentive compatible, and budget-balanced mechanism. Our mechanism allocates the object to the highest valued agent with more than 99% probability provided there are at least 14 agents. It is also ex-post individually rational. We show that our mechanism is optimal in a restricted class of satisfactory ranking mechanisms. Since achieving efficiency through a dominant strategy incentive compatible and budget-balanced mechanism is impossible in this model, our results illustrate the limits of this impossibility.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
