Calibration of evolutionary diagnostics in high-mass star formation
Sergio Molinari (1), Manuel Merello (1), Davide Elia (1), Riccardo, Cesaroni (2), Leonardo Testi (2), Thomas Robitaille (3) ((1) INAF-Istituto di, Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Roma (2) INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico, di Arcetri, Firenze (3) MPIA, Heidelberg)

TL;DR
This study calibrates the L/M ratio as an evolutionary indicator for high-mass star-forming clumps, using molecular thermometry to identify three distinct star formation phases based on temperature and luminosity/mass ratios.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative calibration linking L/M ratios to specific evolutionary stages in massive star formation, supported by molecular temperature measurements.
Findings
Three L/M ranges correspond to different star formation phases.
Clumps with L/M<1 are cold (<30K) and inactive.
Clumps with L/M>10 show increasing temperatures and signs of ZAMS stars.
Abstract
The evolutionary classification of massive clumps that are candidate progenitors of high-mass young stars and clusters relies on a variety of independent diagnostics based on observables from the near-infrared to the radio. A promising evolutionary indicator for massive and dense cluster-progenitor clumps is the L/M ratio between the bolometric luminosity and the mass of the clumps. With the aim of providing a quantitative calibration for this indicator we used SEPIA/APEX to obtain CH3C2H(12-11) observations, that is an excellent thermometer molecule probing densities > 10^5 cm^-3 , toward 51 dense clumps with M>1000 solar masses, and uniformly spanning -2 < Log(L/M) < 2.3. We identify three distinct ranges of L/M that can be associated to three distinct phases of star formation in massive clumps. For L/M <1 no clump is detected in CH3C2H , suggesting an inner envelope temperature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
