AMI observations of ten CLASH galaxy clusters: SZ and X-ray data used together to determine cluster dynamical states

TL;DR

This study uses combined SZ and X-ray data from AMI and Chandra to analyze the dynamical states of ten CLASH galaxy clusters, revealing merger influences on scaling relations and cluster properties.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian analysis of AMI SZ data considering pressure profile variations to assess merger effects on cluster scaling relations and dynamical states.

Findings

Merger activity causes small deviations from self-similar scaling relations.

Clusters show movement along the $Y_X$--$M_{gas}$ relation due to mergers.

Discrepancies between SZ and X-ray estimates identify disturbed and merging clusters.

Abstract

Using Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) SZ observations towards ten CLASH clusters we investigate the influence of cluster mergers on observational galaxy cluster studies. Although selected to be largely relaxed, there is disagreement in the literature on the dynamical states of CLASH sample members. We analyse our AMI data in a fully Bayesian way to produce estimated cluster parameters and consider the intrinsic correlations in our NFW/GNFW-based model. Varying pressure profile shape parameters, illustrating an influence of mergers on scaling relations, induces small deviations from the canonical self-similar predictions -- in agreement with simulations of Poole et al. 2007 who found that merger activity causes only small scatter perpendicular to the relations. We demonstrate this effect observationally using the different dependencies of SZ and X-ray signals to $n_{\rm e}$ that cause different sensitivities to the shocking and/or fractionation produced by mergers. Plotting $Y_{\rm X}$--$M_{\rm gas}$ relations (where $Y_{\rm X}=M_{\rm gas}T$) derived from AMI SZ and from $Chandra$ X-ray gives ratios of AMI and $Chandra$ $Y_{\rm X}$ and $M_{\rm gas}$ estimates that indicate movement of clusters \textit{along} the scaling relation, as predicted by Poole et al. 2007. Clusters that have moved most along the relation have the most discrepant $T_{\rm SZ}$ and $T_{\rm X}$ estimates: all the other clusters (apart from one) have SZ and X-ray estimates of $M_{\rm gas}$, $T$ and $Y_{\rm X}$ that agree within $r_{500}$. We use SZ vs X-ray discrepancies in conjunction with $Chandra$ maps and $T_{\rm X}$ profiles, making comparisons with simulated cluster merger maps in Poole et al. 2006, to identify disturbed members of our sample and estimate merger stages.