ALMA Imaging and Gravitational Lens Models of South Pole Telescope-Selected Dusty, Star-Forming Galaxies at High Redshifts
Justin Spilker, Daniel Marrone, Manuel Aravena, Matthieu Bethermin,, Matt Bothwell, John Carlstrom, Scott Chapman, Tom Crawford, Carlos de Breuck,, Chris Fassnacht, Anthony Gonzalez, Thomas Greve, Yashar Hezaveh, Katrina, Litke, Jingzhe Ma, Matt Malkan, Kaja Rotermund

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution ALMA imaging and gravitational lens modeling to analyze a sample of high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies, revealing their sizes, magnifications, and dust properties, and comparing them to unlensed counterparts.
Contribution
It provides detailed gravitational lens models and size measurements for high-redshift DSFGs, and explores their dust optical depth, temperature, and [CII] emission properties, advancing understanding of their physical characteristics.
Findings
70% of sources are strongly lensed with median magnification of 6.3
No significant size difference between lensed and unlensed DSFGs
Dust optical depth wavelength correlates with dust temperature, affecting mass estimates
Abstract
The South Pole Telescope has discovered one hundred gravitationally lensed, high-redshift, dusty, star-forming galaxies (DSFGs). We present 0.5" resolution 870um Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array imaging of a sample of 47 DSFGs spanning z=1.9-5.7, and construct gravitational lens models of these sources. Our visibility-based lens modeling incorporates several sources of residual interferometric calibration uncertainty, allowing us to properly account for noise in the observations. At least 70% of the sources are strongly lensed by foreground galaxies (mu_870um > 2), with a median magnification mu_870um = 6.3, extending to mu_870um > 30. We compare the intrinsic size distribution of the strongly lensed sources to a similar number of unlensed DSFGs and find no significant differences in spite of a bias between the magnification and intrinsic source size. This may indicate that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
