The flux dynamics behavior of the two competing high temperature superconducting phases in underdoped LaCuO4.06
D. Di Gioacchino, A. Puri, A. Marcelli, N. Poccia, A. Ricci, A., Bianconi

TL;DR
This study investigates the flux dynamics of two coexisting superconducting phases in underdoped LaCuO4.06, revealing distinct vortex behaviors linked to their different spatial distributions and geometries.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental evidence of different flux pinning mechanisms in two coexisting superconducting phases within the same material.
Findings
Low Tc phase exhibits bulk-like flux pinning with 2D geometry.
High Tc phase shows barrier pinning, indicating different vortex dynamics.
Distinct flux behaviors are linked to the phases' spatial distributions.
Abstract
In complex transition metal oxides (TMO) an arrested electronic phase separation (PS) appears by tuning the system near a Lifshitz transition in multiband Hubbard models. The PS in La2CuO4+y near insulator to metal transition (IMT) is made of short range Charge Density Wave (CDW) order inhomogeneity coexisting with quenched lattice disorder. While at high doping y=0.1 percolation gives a single superconducting phase, near the IMT at y=0.06 two coexisting superconducting phases appear: the first one with a critical temperature Tc1=16 K and the second one with Tc2=29K. It is known that the two superconducting phases are characterized by two different space geometry because of two different spatial distributions of both CDW order and dopants self-organization. Here we show that these two phases show different flux dynamic regimes using alternating current (AC) multi-harmonic susceptibility…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
