Dichotomy between Attractive and Repulsive Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquids in Spin Ladders
M. Jeong, D. Schmidiger, H. Mayaffre, M. Klanj\v{s}ek, C. Berthier, W., Knafo, G. Ballon, B. Vignolle, S. Kr\"amer, A. Zheludev, and M. Horvati\'c

TL;DR
This paper introduces two methods to determine whether the interactions in a spin ladder's Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid state are attractive or repulsive, using bulk measurements and NMR local-probe techniques, with experimental validation on specific compounds.
Contribution
It provides a novel approach combining bulk and local measurements to distinguish attractive from repulsive TLL interactions in spin ladders.
Findings
Concave $T_1^{-1}(H)$ indicates attractive interactions.
Convex $T_1^{-1}(H)$ indicates repulsive interactions.
Experimental validation on strong-leg and strong-rung spin ladder compounds.
Abstract
We present two methods to determine whether the interactions in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) state of a spin- Heisenberg antiferromagnetic ladder are attractive or repulsive. The first method combines two bulk measurements, of magnetization and specific heat, to deduce the TLL parameter that distinguishes between the attraction and repulsion. The second one is based on a local-probe, NMR measurements of the spin-lattice relaxation. For the strong-leg spin ladder compound we find that the isothermal magnetic field dependence of the relaxation rate, , displays a concave curve between the two critical fields that bound the TLL regime. This is in sharp contrast to the convex curve previously reported for a strong-rung ladder . Within the TLL description, we show that the concavity directly reflects the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
