Predictable patterns in planetary transit timing variations and transit duration variations due to exomoons
Ren\'e Heller (1), Michael Hippke (2), Ben Placek (3), Daniel, Angerhausen (4,5), Eric Agol (6,7) ((1) Max Planck Institute for Solar System, Research, G\"ottingen (GER), (2) Neukirchen-Vluyn (GER), (3) Schenectady, County Community College, Schenectady NY (USA)

TL;DR
This paper introduces analytical and numerical methods to identify and characterize exomoons through transit timing and duration variations, revealing predictable patterns for single and multiple moons, and assesses their detectability with current and future telescopes.
Contribution
It provides new analytical patterns for detecting exomoons in TTV-TDV diagrams and demonstrates their potential detectability using existing and upcoming observational data.
Findings
Single exomoons produce predictable TTV-TDV patterns that approach an ellipse with more data.
Multiple moons in MMR create complex loops in TTV-TDV diagrams, with the number of loops indicating the MMR order.
Detectability of large exomoons is feasible with Kepler data; smaller moons require larger telescopes or brighter stars.
Abstract
We present new ways to identify single and multiple moons around extrasolar planets using planetary transit timing variations (TTVs) and transit duration variations (TDVs). For planets with one moon, measurements from successive transits exhibit a hitherto undescribed pattern in the TTV-TDV diagram, originating from the stroboscopic sampling of the planet's orbit around the planet-moon barycenter. This pattern is fully determined and analytically predictable after three consecutive transits. The more measurements become available, the more the TTV-TDV diagram approaches an ellipse. For planets with multiple moons in orbital mean motion resonance (MMR), like the Galilean moons, the pattern is much more complex and addressed numerically in this report. Exomoons in MMR can also form closed, predictable TTV-TDV figures if the drift of the moons' pericenters is sufficiently slow. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
