Participation Cost Estimation: Private Versus Non-Private Study
Joshua Joy, Sayali Rajwade, Mario Gerla

TL;DR
This paper compares private and non-private methods for estimating crowd levels using user location data, demonstrating that privacy-preserving mechanisms can incentivize user participation effectively.
Contribution
It introduces an analysis of privacy-preserving mechanisms in real-time crowd estimation, highlighting their benefits in encouraging user participation.
Findings
Privacy mechanisms incentivize user sharing.
Private data collection can match non-private accuracy.
User participation increases with privacy protections.
Abstract
In our study, we seek to learn the real-time crowd levels at popular points of interests based on users continually sharing their location data. We evaluate the benefits of users sharing their location data privately and non-privately, and show that suitable privacy-preserving mechanisms provide incentives for user participation in a private study as compared to a non-private study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
