On a paraconsistentization functor in the category of consequence structures
Edelcio G. de Souza, Alexandre Costa-Leite, Diogo H.B. Dias

TL;DR
This paper introduces a categorical functor to transform classical logic into a paraconsistent logic, enabling reasoning in the presence of contradictions without trivialization.
Contribution
It proposes a novel functor within category theory to systematically convert classical consequence structures into paraconsistent ones.
Findings
Defined a category of consequence structures
Constructed a functor for paraconsistentization
Applied the method to classical propositional logic
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to solve the following problem: given a logic, how to turn it into a paraconsistent one? In other words, given a logic in which \emph{ex falso quodlibet} holds, how to convert it into a logic not satisfying this principle? We use a framework provided by category theory in order to define a category of consequence structures. Then, we propose a functor to transform a logic not able to deal with contradictions into a paraconsistent one. Moreover, we study the case of paraconsistentization of propositional classical logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
