Boundedness of the density normalised Jones' square function does not imply $1$-rectifiability
Henri Martikainen, Tuomas Orponen

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that boundedness of the density-normalized Jones' square function does not imply 1-rectifiability by constructing a measure with bounded Jones' function but zero lower density, showing the converse does not hold.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample to the previously assumed implication between Jones' square function boundedness and 1-rectifiability.
Findings
Constructed a measure with bounded Jones' function but zero lower density almost everywhere.
Showed that bounded Jones' function does not imply 1-rectifiability.
Established that the converse of a known implication is false.
Abstract
Recently, M. Badger and R. Schul proved that for a -rectifiable Radon measure , the density weighted Jones' square function is finite for -a.e. . Answering a question of Badger-Schul, we show that the converse is not true. Given , we construct a Radon probability measure on with the properties that for all , but nevertheless the -dimensional lower density of vanishes almost everywhere. In particular, is purely -unrectifiable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
