On closest isotropic tensors and their norms
Tomasz Danek, Andrea Noseworthy, Michael A. Slawinski

TL;DR
This paper compares four methods for approximating anisotropic elasticity tensors with the closest isotropic tensors, analyzing their similarities and differences within measurement error ranges.
Contribution
It introduces and compares four different criteria for determining the closest isotropic tensor to a given anisotropic elasticity tensor.
Findings
The four approaches yield similar isotropic tensors within measurement error ranges.
Different criteria can lead to slightly different isotropic approximations.
The methods provide a basis for choosing appropriate approximation criteria in practice.
Abstract
An anisotropic elasticity tensor can be approximated by the closest tensor belonging to a higher symmetry class. The closeness of tensors depends on the choice of a criterion. We compare the closest isotropic tensors obtained using four approaches: the Frobenius 36-component norm, the Frobenius 21-component norm, the operator norm and the L2 slowness-curve fit. We find that the isotropic tensors are similar to each other within the range of expected measurement errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
