Sunspot numbers based on historic records in the 1610s - early telescopic observations by Simon Marius and others
Ralph Neuhaeuser, Dagmar L. Neuhaeuser (AIU, U Jena, Germany)

TL;DR
This paper revises historical sunspot records from the 1610s, clarifying Simon Marius's observations and correcting previous misinterpretations, thereby providing a more accurate early solar activity timeline.
Contribution
It presents new analysis of Marius's sunspot observations, correcting prior misinterpretations and establishing a detailed timeline of early 17th-century solar activity.
Findings
Marius observed sunspots from 1611 onwards with detailed records.
Sunspot activity was higher than previously thought before fall 1617.
The Schwabe cycle minimum occurred around 1620.
Abstract
Hoyt & Schatten (1998) claim that Simon Marius would have observed the sun from 1617 Jun 7 to 1618 Dec 31 (Gregorian calendar) all days, except three short gaps in 1618, but would never have detected a sunspot -- based on a quotation from Marius in Wolf (1857), but misinterpreted by Hoyt & Schatten. Marius himself specified in early 1619 that "for one and a half year ... rather few or more often no spots could be detected ... which was never observed before" (Marius 1619). The generic statement by Marius can be interpreted such that the active day fraction was below 0.5 (but not zero) from fall 1617 to spring 1619 and that it was 1 before fall 1617 (since August 1611). Hoyt & Schatten cite Zinner (1952), who referred to Zinner (1942), where observing dates by Marius since 1611 are given, but which were not used by Hoyt & Schatten. We present all relevant texts from Marius where he…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
