Some Infinitary Paradoxes and Undecidable Sentences in Peano Arithmetic
Ka-Yue Cheng

TL;DR
This paper explores infinitary paradoxes and demonstrates how they can be translated into undecidable sentences within Peano arithmetic, providing insights into the nature of incompleteness and undecidability.
Contribution
It introduces new infinitary paradoxes and shows their translation into undecidable sentences in Peano arithmetic, partly confirming G"odel's claim about paradoxes and incompleteness.
Findings
Infinitary paradoxes can be translated into undecidable sentences in Peano arithmetic.
The results support G"odel's assertion about the connection between paradoxes and incompleteness.
The paper provides new examples of undecidable statements derived from paradoxical reasoning.
Abstract
According to Chaitin, G\"odel once told him "it doesn't matter which paradox you use [to prove the First Incompleteness Theorem]". In this paper I will present a few infinitary paradoxes and show how to "translate" them to some undecidable sentences in Peano arithmetic, like what G\"odel did to the Liar paradox. The results partly verify G\"odel's claim.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
