Fully-Automatic Synapse Prediction and Validation on a Large Data Set
Gary B. Huang, Louis K. Scheffer, Stephen M. Plaza

TL;DR
This paper presents a fully-automatic method for detecting synapses in electron microscopy data, significantly reducing manual effort and improving the speed and accuracy of connectome reconstruction.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, minimally-supervised algorithm for polyadic synapse detection that leverages segmentation advances and provides new evaluation metrics.
Findings
Automatic synapse detection achieves high accuracy
The method reduces manual annotation time significantly
New metrics effectively evaluate large-scale connectome predictions
Abstract
Extracting a connectome from an electron microscopy (EM) data set requires identification of neurons and determination of synapses between neurons. As manual extraction of this information is very time-consuming, there has been extensive research effort to automatically segment the neurons to help guide and eventually replace manual tracing. Until recently, there has been comparatively less research on automatically detecting the actual synapses between neurons. This discrepancy can, in part, be attributed to several factors: obtaining neuronal shapes is a prerequisite first step in extracting a connectome, manual tracing is much more time-consuming than annotating synapses, and neuronal contact area can be used as a proxy for synapses in determining connections. However, recent research has demonstrated that contact area alone is not a sufficient predictor of synaptic connection.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
