Einstein's Physical Strategy, Energy Conservation, Symmetries, and Stability: "but Grossmann & I believed that the conservation laws were not satisfied"
J. Brian Pitts

TL;DR
This paper explores Einstein's physical strategy in deriving his field equations, focusing on energy conservation, symmetries, and stability issues, and compares it with particle physics approaches and historical perspectives.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of Einstein's use of energy-momentum complexes, symmetries, and stability considerations in the context of the Entwurf theory and its historical critique.
Findings
Einstein's Entwurf Lagrangian modeled on a scalar theory, not Maxwell's.
The Entwurf theory has three ghosts, failing stability tests.
Historical analysis of Einstein's energy conservation and symmetry use.
Abstract
Recent work on the history of General Relativity by Renn, Sauer, Janssen et al. shows that Einstein found his field equations partly by a physical strategy including the Newtonian limit, the electromagnetic analogy, and energy conservation. Such themes are similar to those later used by particle physicists. How do Einstein's physical strategy and the particle physics derivations compare? What energy-momentum complex(es) did he use and why? Did Einstein tie conservation to symmetries, and if so, to which? Einstein used an identity from his assumed linear coordinate covariance x'= Mx to relate it to the canonical tensor. Usually he avoided using matter Euler-Lagrange equations and so was not well positioned to use or reinvent the Herglotz-Mie-Born understanding that the canonical tensor was conserved due to translation symmetries, a result with roots in Lagrange, Hamilton and Jacobi.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
