On the red giant branch mass loss in 47 Tucanae: Constraints from the horizontal branch morphology
Maurizio Salaris (1), Santi Cassisi (2,3), Adriano Pietrinferni (2), (1, Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, UK, 2,, INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Teramo, I, 3, Instituto de Astrofisica de, Canarias, SP)

TL;DR
This study constrains the mass loss of red giant branch stars in 47 Tucanae by modeling the horizontal branch morphology, revealing a minimum mass loss of about 0.17 solar masses and highlighting discrepancies with dynamical studies.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed quantitative constraints on RGB mass loss in 47 Tuc, integrating stellar evolution models with observed horizontal branch distributions.
Findings
Minimum RGB mass loss of ~0.17 solar masses.
Mass loss on the AGB is comparable to RGB mass loss.
Discrepancy between CMD analysis and dynamical inferences.
Abstract
We obtain stringent constraints on the actual efficiency of mass loss for red giant branch stars in the Galactic globular cluster 47 Tuc, by comparing synthetic modeling based on stellar evolution tracks with the observed distribution of stars along the horizontal branch in the colour-magnitude-diagram. We confirm that the observed, wedge-shaped distribution of the horizontal branch can be reproduced only by accounting for a range of initial He abundances --in agreement with inferences from the analysis of the main sequence-- and a red giant branch mass loss with a small dispersion. We have carefully investigated several possible sources of uncertainty that could affect the results of the horizontal branch modeling, stemming from uncertainties in both stellar model computations and the cluster properties such as heavy element abundances, reddening and age. We determine a firm lower…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
