Beyond Brightness Constancy: Learning Noise Models for Optical Flow
Dan Rosenbaum, Yair Weiss

TL;DR
This paper introduces a learned noise model for optical flow that outperforms traditional brightness constancy assumptions by explicitly modeling warp error patches with a GMM, leading to improved flow estimation.
Contribution
It proposes a generative approach to learn a data cost using GMMs for warp error patches, capturing spatial structure and improving optical flow accuracy.
Findings
GMM-based warp error modeling outperforms traditional constancy assumptions.
Using expected patch log-likelihood improves optical flow estimation.
Iterative optimization with denoising enhances flow accuracy.
Abstract
Optical flow is typically estimated by minimizing a "data cost" and an optional regularizer. While there has been much work on different regularizers many modern algorithms still use a data cost that is not very different from the ones used over 30 years ago: a robust version of brightness constancy or gradient constancy. In this paper we leverage the recent availability of ground-truth optical flow databases in order to learn a data cost. Specifically we take a generative approach in which the data cost models the distribution of noise after warping an image according to the flow and we measure the "goodness" of a data cost by how well it matches the true distribution of flow warp error. Consistent with current practice, we find that robust versions of gradient constancy are better models than simple brightness constancy but a learned GMM that models the density of patches of warp…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Vision and Imaging · Advanced Image Processing Techniques · Retinal Imaging and Analysis
