ANOVA model for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data
Victoria Nyaga, Marc Aerts, Marc Arbyn

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel hierarchical arm-based model for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, effectively handling the correlation between sensitivity and specificity and providing more interpretable results.
Contribution
The paper proposes a simple, hierarchical arm-based model for NMA of diagnostic accuracy studies, improving interpretability and data utilization over existing contrast-based models.
Findings
The AB model performs well on real meta-analyses of cervical cancer tests.
It yields easily interpretable marginal means.
It accommodates complex variance-covariance structures.
Abstract
Network meta-analysis (NMA) allow combining efficacy information from multiple comparisons from trials assessing different therapeutic interventions for a given disease and to estimate unobserved comparisons from a network of observed comparisons. Applying NMA on diagnostic accuracy studies is a statistical challenge given the inherent correlation of sensitivity and specificity. A conceptually simple and novel hierarchical arm-based (AB) model which expresses the logit transformed sensitivity and specificity as sum of fixed effects for test, correlated study-effects and a random error associated with various tests evaluated in given study is proposed. We apply the model to previously published meta-analyses assessing the accuracy of diverse cytological and molecular tests used to triage women with minor cervical lesions to detect cervical precancer and the results compared with those…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
