The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. I. An Independent Approach to the Extragalactic Distance Scale Using only Population II Distance Indicators
Rachael L. Beaton, Wendy L. Freedman, Barry F. Madore, Giuseppe Bono,, Erika K. Carlson, Gisella Clementini, Meredith J. Durbin, Alessia Garofalo,, Dylan Hatt, In Sung Jang, Juna A. Kollmeier, Myung Gyoon Lee, Andrew J., Monson, Jeffrey A. Rich, Victoria Scowcroft, Mark Seibert

TL;DR
The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program proposes an independent method to measure the Hubble constant using Population II stars, aiming for 3% accuracy and reducing systematic uncertainties compared to traditional Cepheid-based methods.
Contribution
It introduces a new, independent distance ladder utilizing RR Lyrae, TRGB, and SNe Ia, avoiding reliance on Cepheids and the LMC, with improved calibration prospects from Gaia.
Findings
Potential for 3% measurement accuracy of H0.
Robustness to metallicity and extinction effects.
Systematic advantages due to fewer host galaxy calibrators.
Abstract
We present an overview of the Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program, an ongoing program to obtain a 3 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant using alternative methods to the traditional Cepheid distance scale. We aim to establish a completely independent route to the Hubble constant using RR Lyrae variables, the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), and Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). This alternative distance ladder can be applied to galaxies of any Hubble Type, of any inclination, and, utilizing old stars in low density environments, is robust to the degenerate effects of metallicity and interstellar extinction. Given the relatively small number of SNe Ia host galaxies with independently measured distances, these properties provide a great systematic advantage in the measurement of the Hubble constant via the distance ladder. Initially, the accuracy of our value of the Hubble constant will…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
