On semigroups with PSPACE-complete subpower membership problem
Markus Steindl

TL;DR
This paper classifies the computational complexity of the subpower membership problem for various finite semigroups, revealing cases where it is polynomial-time solvable, NP-complete, or PSPACE-complete, including some well-known semigroups.
Contribution
It provides a dichotomy and trichotomy classification for the SMP in combinatorial Rees matrix semigroups, identifying conditions leading to PSPACE-completeness.
Findings
SMP is in P for certain matrix forms
SMP is NP-complete for other matrix forms
SMP is PSPACE-complete for some semigroups like the Brandt monoid and matrix semigroups
Abstract
Fix a finite semigroup and let be tuples in a direct power . The subpower membership problem (SMP) for asks whether can be generated by . For combinatorial Rees matrix semigroups we establish a dichotomy result: if the corresponding matrix is of a certain form, then the SMP is in P; otherwise it is NP-complete. For combinatorial Rees matrix semigroups with adjoined identity, we obtain a trichotomy: the SMP is either in P, NP-complete, or PSPACE-complete. This result yields various semigroups with PSPACE-complete SMP including the -element Brandt monoid, the full transformation semigroup on or more letters, and semigroups of all by matrices over a field for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
