Comments on: "A Random Forest Guided Tour" by G. Biau and E. Scornet
Sylvain Arlot (LMO, SELECT), Robin Genuer (ISPED, SISTM)

TL;DR
This paper comments on a survey of random forests, exploring how individual components affect performance, and introduces a quantification method for simple pure forests and hold-out forests as intermediate models.
Contribution
It provides a method to quantify the impact of each ingredient in random forests, especially for simple pure and hold-out forests, bridging toy models and original algorithms.
Findings
Quantification of ingredient impact in simple pure forests
Analysis of hold-out random forests as intermediate models
Insights applicable to more general random forest variants
Abstract
This paper is a comment on the survey paper by Biau and Scornet (2016) about random forests. We focus on the problem of quantifying the impact of each ingredient of random forests on their performance. We show that such a quantification is possible for a simple pure forest , leading to conclusions that could apply more generally. Then, we consider "hold-out" random forests, which are a good middle point between "toy" pure forests and Breiman's original random forests.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Data Management and Algorithms · Forest ecology and management
