Are LGRBs biased tracers of star formation? Clues from the host galaxies of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of bright LGRBs. II: star formation rates and metallicities at z < 1
J. Japelj, S. D. Vergani, R. Salvaterra, P. D'Avanzo, F. Mannucci, A., Fernandez-Soto, S. Boissier, L. K. Hunt, H. Atek, L. Rodr\'iguez-Mu\~noz, M., Scodeggio, S. Cristiani, E. Le Floc'h, H. Flores, J. Gallego, G. Ghirlanda,, A. Gomboc, F. Hammer, D. A. Perley, A. Pescalli

TL;DR
This study investigates the properties of host galaxies of bright long gamma-ray bursts at z < 1, revealing their lower star formation rates and metallicity preferences, and assessing their bias as tracers of cosmic star formation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of LGRB host galaxy properties at low redshift, highlighting environmental biases and comparing them to general star-forming galaxy populations.
Findings
LGRB hosts have lower SFRs than typical star-forming galaxies.
Metallicity distribution of LGRB hosts matches star-forming galaxies up to Z ~ 8.4-8.5.
A possible increased incidence of starburst galaxies among LGRB hosts.
Abstract
Long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) are associated with the deaths of massive stars and could thus be a potentially powerful tool to trace cosmic star formation. However, especially at low redshifts (z < 1.5) LGRBs seem to prefer particular types of environment. Our aim is to study the host galaxies of a complete sample of bright LGRBs to investigate the impact of the environment on GRB formation. We study host galaxy spectra of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of 14 z < 1 bright LGRBs. We use the detected nebular emission lines to measure the dust extinction, star formation rate (SFR) and nebular metallicity (Z) of the hosts and supplement the data set with previously measured stellar masses M. The distributions of the obtained properties and their interrelations (e.g. mass-metallicity and SFR-M relations) are compared to samples of field star-forming galaxies.We find that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
