Computing Join Queries with Functional Dependencies

TL;DR

This paper introduces an algorithm for computing join queries with functional dependencies that is nearly optimal according to the GLVV bound, extending previous bounds and solving related problems with degree bounds.

Contribution

It extends the GLVV framework by using the lattice of closed sets, providing new insights and algorithms that are nearly worst-case optimal for queries with FDs.

Findings

Algorithm runs within GLVV bound up to a poly-log factor.

Algorithm is worst-case optimal for queries where the GLVV bound is tight.

Shows tightness of the GLVV bound on distributive lattices.

Abstract

Recently, Gottlob, Lee, Valiant, and Valiant (GLVV) presented an output size bound for join queries with functional dependencies (FD), based on a linear program on polymatroids. GLVV bound strictly generalizes the bound of Atserias, Grohe and Marx (AGM) for queries with no FD, in which case there are known algorithms running within AGM bound and thus are worst-case optimal. A main result of this paper is an algorithm for computing join queries with FDs, running within GLVV bound up to a poly-log factor. In particular, our algorithm is worst-case optimal for any query where the GLVV bound is tight. As an unexpected by-product, our algorithm manages to solve a harder problem, where (some) input relations may have prescribed maximum degree bounds, of which both functional dependencies and cardinality bounds are special cases. We extend Gottlob et al. framework by replacing all variable subsets with the lattice of closed sets (under the given FDs). This gives us new insights into the structure of the worst-case bound and worst-case instances. While it is still open whether GLVV bound is tight in general, we show that it is tight on distributive lattices and some other simple lattices. Distributive lattices capture a strict superset of queries with no FD and with simple FDs. We also present two simpler algorithms which are also worst-case optimal on distributive lattices within a single-$\log$ factor, but they do not match GLVV bound on a general lattice. Our algorithms are designed based on a novel principle: we turn a proof of a polymatroid-based output size bound into an algorithm.