Performance of the EUDET-type beam telescopes
H. Jansen, S. Spannagel, J. Behr, A. Bulgheroni, G. Claus, E. Corrin,, D. G. Cussans, J. Dreyling-Eschweiler, D. Eckstein, T. Eichhorn, M. Goffe, I., M. Gregor, D. Haas, C. Muhl, H. Perrey, R. Peschke, P. Roloff, I. Rubinskiy,, M. Winter

TL;DR
This study evaluates the performance of EUDET-type beam telescopes with MIMOSA26 sensors at DESY, analyzing spatial resolution, intrinsic sensor resolution, and effects of beam energy and sensor thresholds.
Contribution
It provides detailed performance metrics and calibration methods for EUDET-type beam telescopes, including intrinsic resolution and optimal sensor thresholds, based on extensive test beam measurements.
Findings
Measured residual distribution standard deviation at 6 GeV is 2.88 micrometers.
Estimated intrinsic sensor resolution is approximately 3.24 micrometers.
Track resolution at 5 GeV is about 1.83 micrometers, with deterioration at lower energies.
Abstract
Test beam measurements at the test beam facilities of DESY have been conducted to characterise the performance of the EUDET-type beam telescopes originally developed within the EUDET project. The beam telescopes are equipped with six sensor planes using MIMOSA26 monolithic active pixel devices. A programmable Trigger Logic Unit provides trigger logic and time stamp information on particle passage. Both data acquisition framework and offline reconstruction software packages are available. User devices are easily integrable into the data acquisition framework via predefined interfaces. The biased residual distribution is studied as a function of the beam energy, plane spacing and sensor threshold. Its standard deviation at the two centre pixel planes using all six planes for tracking in a 6\,GeV electron/positron-beam is measured to be .Iterative track…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
