The Spectral Slope and Escape Fraction of Bright Quasars at $z \sim 3.8$: the Contribution to the Cosmic UV Background
Stefano Cristiani (1,2), Luisa Maria Serrano (3,1), Fabio Fontanot, (1), Rajesh R. Koothrappali (1), Eros Vanzella (4), Pierluigi Monaco (3) ((1), INAF - OATs (2) INFN (3) UNITS (4) INAF - OABo)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the spectral slope and escape fraction of bright quasars at redshift around 3.8, estimating their contribution to the cosmic UV background and showing that quasars dominate the UV ionizing background up to z~3, with galaxies contributing more at higher redshifts.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of the spectral slope and escape fraction of quasars at z~3.8, and models their contribution to the cosmic UV background across redshifts.
Findings
Median spectral slope γ=1.30 with no redshift dependence.
Mean escape fraction f_esc=0.75, rising to 0.82 with a double power-law model.
Quasars dominate the UV background up to z~3, galaxies contribute more at higher redshifts.
Abstract
We use a sample of 1669 QSOs (, ) from the BOSS survey to study the intrinsic shape of their continuum and the Lyman continuum photon escape fraction (f), estimated as the ratio between the observed flux and the expected intrinsic flux (corrected for the intergalactic medium absorption) in the wavelength range 865-885 \AA\ rest-frame. Modelling the intrinsic QSO continuum shape with a power-law, , we find a median (with a dispersion of , no dependence on the redshift and a mild intrinsic luminosity dependence) and a mean f (independent of the QSO luminosity and/or redshift). The f distribution shows a peak around zero and a long tail of higher values, with a resulting dispersion of . If we assume for the QSO continuum a double power-law shape (also compatible with the data)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
