The Hodge theory of the Decomposition Theorem (after de Cataldo and Migliorini)
Geordie Williamson

TL;DR
This paper discusses a new, elementary proof of the Decomposition Theorem in algebraic geometry, connecting Hodge theory and perverse sheaves, with broad implications across multiple mathematical disciplines.
Contribution
It provides a simplified proof of the Decomposition Theorem using classical Hodge theory and perverse sheaves, making the theorem more accessible and easier to apply.
Findings
New proof of the Decomposition Theorem using classical Hodge theory
Connections established between Hodge theory and perverse sheaves
Broader applicability in algebraic geometry and related fields
Abstract
In its simplest form the Decomposition Theorem asserts that the rational intersection cohomology of a complex projective variety occurs as a summand of the cohomology of any resolution. This deep theorem has found important applications in algebraic geometry, representation theory, number theory and combinatorics. It was originally proved in 1981 by Beilinson, Bernstein, Deligne and Gabber as a consequence of Deligne's proof of the Weil conjectures. A different proof was given by Saito in 1988, as a consequence of his theory of mixed Hodge modules. More recently, de Cataldo and Migliorini found a much more elementary proof which uses only classical Hodge theory and the theory of perverse sheaves. We present the theorem and outline the main ideas involved in the new proof.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
