About neutral mesons and particle oscillations in the light of field-theoretical prescriptions of Weinberg
L.M. Slad

TL;DR
This paper revisits the theoretical understanding of neutral mesons and their oscillations, arguing that certain states do not physically exist and challenging the conventional notion of meson oscillations based on field-theoretical principles.
Contribution
It extends Weinberg's prescriptions to show that neutral mesons are only the $K_{S}^{0}$ and $K_{L}^{0}$ states, eliminating the physical existence of $K^{0}$ and $ar{K}^{0}$ and their oscillations.
Findings
Neutral $K$-mesons are only $K_{S}^{0}$ and $K_{L}^{0}$.
States $K^{0}$ and $ar{K}^{0}$ do not exist as physical particles.
The concept of meson oscillations is invalidated under this framework.
Abstract
By extending the well-known Weinberg's prescriptions on the diagonalization of the mass term of the Lagrangian without increasing the total number of entities, we get the following conclusions: the set of neutral -mesons consists of two elements, and ; the states and do not exist as physical objects (in the form of particles or "particle mixtures"); the absence of the states and destroys the grounds for introducing the notion of their oscillations, further replicated as the neutrino oscillation concept. The conclusions concerning the neutral -mesons are also applicable to the neutral -, - and -mesons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
