The diversity of Type II supernova versus the similarity in their progenitors
S. Valenti (1), D. A. Howell, M. D. Stritzinger, M. L. Graham, G., Hosseinzadeh, I. Arcavi, L. Bildsten, A. Jerkstrand, C. McCully, A., Pastorello, A. L. Piro, D. Sand, S. J. Smartt, G. Terreran, C. Baltay, S., Benetti, P. Brown, A. V. Filippenko, M. Fraser, D. Rabinowitz

TL;DR
This study analyzes the diversity of Type II supernovae through photometry and spectra, revealing that their progenitors are similar red supergiants despite differences in light curve decline rates.
Contribution
It provides new observational data and analysis linking supernova light curve diversity to progenitor characteristics, challenging previous assumptions about their differences.
Findings
SNe IIL are more luminous than SNe IIP.
SNe IIL do not produce more 56Ni than SNe IIP.
Progenitors are consistent with 12-16 Msun red supergiants.
Abstract
High-quality collections of Type II supernova (SN) light curves are scarce because they evolve for hundreds of days, making follow-up observations time consuming and often extending over multiple observing seasons. In light of these difficulties, the diversity of SNe II is not fully understood. Here we present ultraviolet and optical photometry of 12 SNe II monitored by the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (LCOGT) during 2013-2014, and compare them with previously studied SNe having well-sampled light curves. We explore SN II diversity by searching for correlations between the slope of the linear light-curve decay after maximum light (historically used to divide SNe II into IIL and IIP) and other measured physical properties. While SNe IIL are found to be on average more luminous than SNe IIP, SNe IIL do not appear to synthesize more 56Ni than SNe IIP. Finally, optical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
