Who Is Guilty?
Benjamin Chen, Ezra Erives, Leon Fan, Michael Gerovitch, Jonathan Hsu,, Tanya Khovanova, Neil Malur, Ashwin Padaki, Nastia Polina, Will Sun, Jacob, Tan, Andrew The
TL;DR
This paper explores a generalized logic puzzle involving truth-tellers and liars who may deviate from their usual pattern when asked about guilt, adding complexity to traditional guilt puzzles.
Contribution
It introduces a novel variation of guilt puzzles allowing deviations in responses, expanding the scope of logical analysis in such puzzles.
Findings
Analysis of possible response patterns under deviation rules
Identification of conditions for determining guilt or innocence
Framework for solving similar generalized logic puzzles
Abstract
We discuss a generalization of logic puzzles in which truth-tellers and liars are allowed to deviate from their pattern in case of one particular question: "Are you guilty?"
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Ethics in Business and Education · Cognitive Science and Education Research