
TL;DR
This paper explores why square roots of probabilities appear in various scientific contexts, proposing a vector-based formulation where probabilities are represented by their square roots, linking to concepts like orthogonality and the sum rule.
Contribution
It introduces a novel vector representation of logical statements using square roots of probabilities, connecting probability theory with geometric and quantum concepts.
Findings
Square roots of probabilities relate to vector components in logical hypothesis spaces.
Conditional probabilities can be expressed as dot products of these vectors.
The formulation aligns with orthogonality and the sum rule in probability theory.
Abstract
Square roots of probabilities appear in several contexts, which suggests that they are somehow more fundamental than probabilities. Square roots of probabilities appear in expressions of the Fisher-Rao Metric and the Hellinger-Bhattacharyya distance. They also come into play in Quantum Mechanics via the Born rule where probabilities are found by taking the squared modulus of the quantum amplitude. Why should this be the case and why do these square roots not arise in the various formulations of probability theory? In this short, inconclusive exploration, I consider quantifying a logical statement with a vector defined by a set of components each quantifying one of the atomic statements defining the hypothesis space. I show that conditional probabilities (bi-valuations), such as , can be written as the dot product of the two vectors quantifying the logical statements and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
