An inter comparison of the upper critical fields (Hc2) of different superconductors - YBa2Cu3O7, MgB2, NdFeAsO0.8F0.2, FeSe0.5Te0.5 and Nb2PdS5
R. Sultana, P. Rani, A. K. Hafiz, Reena Goyal, and V. P. S. Awana

TL;DR
This paper compares the upper critical fields of various superconductors using two theoretical models, providing insights into their properties through experimental synthesis and high-field measurements.
Contribution
It offers a systematic comparison of Hc2 in different superconductors using WHH and Ginzburg-Landau theories, based on synthesized samples and high-field data.
Findings
Hc2 values vary across superconductor types
Both models provide consistent Hc2 estimates
Data enhances understanding of superconductor limits
Abstract
Here we report the comparison of the upper critical fields of different superconductors being calculated by two different theories i.e., Werthamer Helfand Hohenburg (WHH) and Ginzberg Landau (GL). All the samples are synthesized through previously known solid state reaction route. Phase purity is determined from the Rietveld refinement of powder X-Ray diffraction (XRD) data. High field (up to 14Tesla) magneto transport \r{ho}(T)H of different superconductors is studied to estimate their upper critical field (Hc2). The present inter comparison covers from Cuprates (YBa2Cu3O7) - Borides (MgB2) - Fe pnictides (NdFeAsO0.8F0.2) and chalcogenides (FeSe0.5Te0.5) to robust Nb2PdS5. The upper critical fields [Hc2(T)] at zero temperature are calculated by extrapolating the data using GL and WHH equations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIron-based superconductors research · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
