Unified Correspondence as a Proof-Theoretic Tool
Giuseppe Greco, Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Apostolos, Tzimoulis, Zhiguang Zhao

TL;DR
This paper explores the connection between correspondence phenomena in modal logic and display calculi, extending Kracht's results to a broad class of nonclassical logics using unified correspondence theory.
Contribution
It generalizes Kracht's characterization of analytic structural rules to DLE-logics through the application of unified correspondence theory.
Findings
Characterizes the space of properly displayable DLE-logics.
Extends Kracht's results to nonclassical logics.
Uses the ALBA algorithm for uniform Sahlqvist-class formula analysis.
Abstract
The present paper aims at establishing formal connections between correspondence phenomena, well known from the area of modal logic, and the theory of display calculi, originated by Belnap. These connections have been seminally observed and exploited by Marcus Kracht, in the context of his characterization of the modal axioms (which he calls primitive formulas) which can be effectively transformed into `analytic' structural rules of display calculi. In this context, a rule is `analytic' if adding it to a display calculus preserves Belnap's cut-elimination theorem. In recent years, the state-of-the-art in correspondence theory has been uniformly extended from classical modal logic to diverse families of nonclassical logics, ranging from (bi-)intuitionistic (modal) logics, linear, relevant and other substructural logics, to hybrid logics and mu-calculi. This generalization has given rise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, programming, and type systems
