Simple Mechanisms For Agents With Complements
Michal Feldman, Ophir Friedler, Jamie Morgenstern, Guy Reiner

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the efficiency of simple auction mechanisms in the presence of complements, introducing a valuation hierarchy and providing bounds on the price of anarchy that degrade gracefully with the degree of complementarity.
Contribution
It introduces a valuation hierarchy that captures complementarity levels and provides new bounds on the price of anarchy for simple auctions within this hierarchy.
Findings
Price of anarchy is $O(d^2 \, \log(m/d))$ for valuations of level $d$.
Improved bound of $O(d \, \log m)$ for hypergraph representations with edges of size at most 2.
Randomized auction combination achieves a price of anarchy of at most $O(\sqrt{m})$.
Abstract
We study the efficiency of simple auctions in the presence of complements. [DMSW15] introduced the single-bid auction, and showed that it has a price of anarchy (PoA) of for complement-free (i.e., subadditive) valuations. Prior to our work, no non-trivial upper bound on the PoA of single bid auctions was known for valuations exhibiting complements. We introduce a hierarchy over valuations, where levels of the hierarchy correspond to the degree of complementarity, and the PoA of the single bid auction degrades gracefully with the level of the hierarchy. This hierarchy is a refinement of the Maximum over Positive Hypergraphs (MPH) hierarchy [FFIILS15], where the degree of complementarity is captured by the maximum number of neighbors of a node in the positive hypergraph representation. We show that the price of anarchy of the single bid auction for valuations of level …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
