Extinction Laws toward Stellar Sources within a Dusty Circimstellar Medium and Implications for Type Ia Supernovae
T. Nagao, K. Maeda, T. Nozawa

TL;DR
This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to analyze how multiple scattering in dusty circumstellar environments affects extinction laws, revealing dependence on dust properties and implications for understanding Type Ia supernovae.
Contribution
It systematically investigates the impact of multiple scattering on extinction laws and links dust grain properties to observed extinction variations, especially in supernova environments.
Findings
Extinction laws are highly dependent on circumstellar dust properties.
The total-to-selective extinction ratio $R_{V}$ can increase or decrease due to multiple scattering.
Small silicate grains or PAHs are needed to explain low $R_{V}$ values in Type Ia supernovae.
Abstract
Many astronomical objects are surrounded by dusty environments. In such dusty objects, multiple scattering processes of photons by circumstellar (CS) dust grains can effectively alter extinction properties. In this paper, we systematically investigate effects of multiple scattering on extinction laws for steady-emission sources surrounded by the dusty CS medium, using a radiation transfer simulation based on the Monte Carlo technique. In particular, we focus on whether and how the extinction properties are affected by properties of CS dust grains, adopting various dust grain models. We {\bf confirm} that behaviors of the (effective) extinction laws are highly dependent on the properties of CS grains. Especially, the total-to-selective extinction ratio , which characterizes the extinction law, can be either increased or decreased, compared to the case without multiple scattering.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
