Obstructing pseudoconvex embeddings and contractible Stein fillings for Brieskorn spheres
Thomas E. Mark, B\"ulent Tosun

TL;DR
This paper proves Gompf's conjecture that certain Brieskorn spheres cannot be pseudoconvex embedded in ${ m C}^2$ with one orientation, and provides examples of contractible 4-manifolds without Stein structures.
Contribution
It verifies Gompf's conjecture for a family of Brieskorn spheres with one orientation and constructs a contractible 4-manifold that admits no Stein structure in either orientation.
Findings
Gompf's conjecture is verified for a family of Brieskorn spheres with one orientation.
An example of a contractible, boundary-irreducible 4-manifold with no Stein structure in either orientation.
Boundary of the manifold admits Stein fillings with both orientations.
Abstract
A conjecture due to Gompf asserts that no nontrivial Brieskorn homology sphere admits a pseudoconvex embedding in , with either orientation. A related question asks whether every compact contractible 4-manifold admits the structure of a Stein domain. We verify Gompf's conjecture, with one orientation, for a family of Brieskorn spheres of which some are known to admit a smooth embedding in . With the other orientation our methods do not resolve the question, but do give rise to an example of a contractible, boundary-irreducible 4-manifold that admits no Stein structure with either orientation, though its boundary has Stein fillings with both orientations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
