Minuscule weights and Chevalley groups
Meinolf Geck

TL;DR
This paper extends Lusztig's simplified construction of Chevalley groups to non-adjoint types by utilizing Jantzen's models of minuscule highest weight representations, removing the need for sign choices.
Contribution
It introduces a new method for constructing Chevalley groups of arbitrary type using minuscule representations, generalizing previous approaches that required sign choices.
Findings
Simplifies Chevalley group construction for non-adjoint types
Uses Jantzen's explicit models of minuscule representations
Removes sign ambiguity in the construction process
Abstract
The traditional construction of Chevalley groups relies on the choice of certain signs for a Chevalley basis of the underlying Lie algebra~. Recently, Lusztig simplified this construction for groups of adjoint type by using the "canonical basis" of the adjoint representation of~, in particular, no choices of signs are required. The purpose of this note is to extend this to Chevalley groups which are not necessarily of adjoint type, using Jantzen's explicit models of the minuscule highest weight representations of~.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
