Bayesian comparison of nonstandard cosmologies using type Ia supernovae and BAO data
B. Santos, N. Chandrachani Devi, J. S. Alcaniz

TL;DR
This study compares standard and alternative cosmological models using recent supernovae and BAO data, employing Bayesian methods to evaluate their statistical support and distinguishability.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian model comparison framework for various cosmologies using JLA supernovae and BAO data, highlighting the discriminative power of combined datasets.
Findings
JLA data alone cannot distinguish models effectively.
Combining JLA with BAO data improves model discrimination.
DGP model is strongly disfavored compared to ΛCDM.
Abstract
We use the most recent type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) observations to perform a statistical comparison between the standard CDM model and its extensions [CDM and CDM] and some alternative cosmologies: namely, the Dvali--Gabadadze--Porrati (DGP) model, a power-law scenario in the metric formalism and an example of vacuum decay [CDM] cosmology in which the dilution of pressureless matter is attenuated with respect to the usual scaling due to the interaction of the dark matter and dark energy fields. We perform a Bayesian model selection analysis using the \textsc{MultiNest} algorithm. To obtain the posterior distribution for the parameters of each model, we use the joint light-curve analysis (JLA) SNe Ia compilation containing 740 events in the interval along with current measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
