Ultra Short Period Planets in K2: SuPerPiG Results for Campaigns 0-5

TL;DR

This study analyzes K2 mission data to identify 19 ultra-short-period planet candidates, including new discoveries, and assesses their characteristics, stability, and occurrence rate compared to Kepler, revealing potential differences in planetary populations.

Contribution

It reports new ultra-short-period planet candidates from K2 Campaigns 0-5 and evaluates their properties, occurrence rates, and potential differences from Kepler planets.

Findings

19 candidate planets identified, 9 are new.

One of the shortest-period planet candidates discovered.

Estimated occurrence rate is about half that of Kepler.

Abstract

We have analyzed data from Campaigns 0-5 of the K2 mission and report 19 ultra-short-period candidate planets with orbital periods of less than 1 day (nine of which have not been previously reported). Planet candidates range in size from 0.7-16 Earth radii and in orbital period from 4.2 to 23.5 hours. One candidate (EPIC 203533312, Kp=12.5) is among the shortest-period planet candidates discovered to date (P=4.2 hours), and, if confirmed as a planet, must have a density of at least rho=8.9 g/cm^3 in order to not be tidally disrupted. Five candidates have nominal radius values in the sub-Jovian desert (R_P=3-11 R_E and P<=1.5 days) where theoretical models do not favor their long-term stability; the only confirmed planet in this range is in fact thought to be disintegrating (EPIC 201637175). In addition to the planet candidates, we report on four objects which may not be planetary, including one with intermittent transits (EPIC 211152484) and three initially promising candidates that are likely false positives based on characteristics of their light curves and on radial velocity follow-up. A list of 91 suspected eclipsing binaries identified at various stages in our vetting process is also provided. Based on an assessment of our survey's completeness, we estimate an occurrence rate for ultra-short period planets among K2 target stars that is about half that estimated from the Kepler sample, raising questions as to whether K2 systems are intrinsically different from Kepler systems, possibly as a result of their different galactic location.