Universal Scaling in the Aging of the Strong Glass Former SiO$_2$

TL;DR

This study reveals that the aging dynamics of the strong glass former SiO$_2$ follow a universal scaling behavior, linking average dynamics with fluctuations, and showing consistency across different particle types and length scales.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the aging behavior of SiO$_2$ can be described by simple scaling forms similar to fragile glass formers, highlighting a universal aspect of glass aging.

Findings

Aging dynamics follow universal scaling forms.

Scaling behavior is consistent across particle types and length scales.

A single aging clock governs both average and fluctuations.

Abstract

We show that the aging dynamics of a strong glass former displays a strikingly simple scaling behavior, connecting the average dynamics with its fluctuations, namely the dynamical heterogeneities. We perform molecular dynamics simulations of SiO$_2$ with BKS interactions, quenching the system from high to low temperature, and study the evolution of the system as a function of the waiting time $t_{\rm w}$ measured from the instant of the quench. We find that both the aging behavior of the dynamic susceptibility $\chi_4$ and the aging behavior of the probability distribution $P(f_{{\rm s},{\mathbf r}})$ of the local incoherent intermediate scattering function $f_{{\rm s},{\mathbf r}}$ can be described by simple scaling forms in terms of the global incoherent intermediate scattering function $C$. The scaling forms are the same that have been found to describe the aging of several fragile glass formers and that, in the case of $P(f_{{\rm s},{\mathbf r}})$, have been also predicted theoretically. A thorough study of the length scales involved highlights the importance of intermediate length scales. We also analyze directly the scaling dependence on particle type and on wavevector $q$, and find that both the average and the fluctuations of the slow aging dynamics are controlled by a unique aging clock, which is not only independent of the wavevector $q$, but is the same for O and Si atoms.