Tukey's transformational ladder for portfolio management
Philip Ernst, James Thompson, and Yinsen Miao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel portfolio weighting method based on Tukey's transformational ladder, demonstrating that the 1/x^2 weighting strategy significantly outperforms traditional market-cap and equal-weighted portfolios over nearly six decades.
Contribution
It is the first to apply Tukey's transformational ladder to portfolio management, revealing a new hierarchy of portfolio performances.
Findings
The 1/x^2 portfolio outperforms all others with an 18% annual return.
The order of returns follows Tukey's transformational ladder.
This approach offers a new perspective on portfolio weighting strategies.
Abstract
Over the past half-century, the empirical finance community has produced vast literature on the advantages of the equally weighted S\&P 500 portfolio as well as the often overlooked disadvantages of the market capitalization weighted Standard and Poor's (S\&P 500) portfolio (see \cite{Bloom}, \cite{Uppal}, \cite{Jacobs}, \cite{Treynor}). However, portfolio allocation based on Tukey's transformational ladde have, rather surprisingly, remained absent from the literature. In this work, we consider the S\&P 500 portfolio over the 1958-2015 time horizon weighted by Tukey's transformational ladder (\cite{Tukey2}): , where is defined as the market capitalization weighted S\&P 500 portfolio. Accounting for dividends and transaction fees, we find that the 1/ weighting strategy produces…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Housing Market and Economics · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
