Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis
B. Hensen, N. Kalb, M.S. Blok, A. Dr\'eau, A. Reiserer, R.F.L., Vermeulen, R.N. Schouten, M. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, K. Goodenough, D., Elkouss, S. Wehner, T.H. Taminiau, R. Hanson

TL;DR
This paper reports a second loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond, confirming the violation of Bell inequality and strengthening evidence against local realism with robust statistical analysis.
Contribution
It presents a second experimental run with minor modifications, confirming Bell violation and analyzing the robustness against RNG imperfections.
Findings
Bell inequality violation of 2.35 ± 0.18 in the second experiment
Combined Bell test value of 2.38 ± 0.14
Observed settings distributions are consistent with uniform randomness
Abstract
The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al., Nature 526, 682-686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental setup with minor modifications. We find a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality of , in agreement with the first run, yielding an overall value of . We calculate the resulting -values of the second experiment and of the combined Bell tests. We provide an additional analysis of the distribution of settings choices recorded during the two tests, finding that the observed distributions are consistent with uniform settings for both tests. Finally, we analytically study the effect of particular models of random number generator (RNG) imperfection on our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
