Dark bubbles around high-redshift radio-loud AGN
Gabriele Ghisellini (1), Tullia Sbarrato (2) ((1) INAF-Brera, Observ., (2) Univ. di Milano Bicocca)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the discrepancy between the observed and expected numbers of high-redshift blazars and their parent populations, proposing that dust obscuration around quasars explains the scarcity of misaligned sources.
Contribution
It introduces a scenario where dust bubbles obscure nuclei, accounting for the missing misaligned blazars at high redshift, independent of jet orientation or Lorentz factor.
Findings
Increased number of identified blazars at z>3 demands a larger parent population.
Detected blazars have sufficient radio flux to be above survey limits.
Obscuration by dust bubbles may hide misaligned sources, explaining the discrepancy.
Abstract
At redshift larger than 3 there is a disagreement between the number of blazars (whose jet is pointing at us) and the number of expected parents (whose jet is pointing elsewhere). Now we strengthen this claim because (i) the number of blazars identified within the SDSS+FIRST survey footprint increased, demanding a more numerous parent population, and (ii) the detected blazars have a radio flux large enough to be above the FIRST flux limit even if the jet is slightly misaligned. The foreseen number of these slightly misaligned jets, in principle detectable, is much larger than the radio-detected sources in the FIRST+SDSS survey (at redshift larger than 4). This argument is independent of the presence of an isotropic radio component, such as the hot spot or the radio lobe, and does not depend on the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma. We propose a scenario that ascribes the lack of slightly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
