Quantification of Uncertainties in Turbulence Modeling: A Comparison of Physics-Based and Random Matrix Theoretic Approaches
Jian-Xun Wang, Rui Sun, Heng Xiao

TL;DR
This paper compares physics-based and random matrix theory approaches for quantifying uncertainties in turbulence modeling, providing insights into prior specification and maximum entropy principles to improve RANS predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a method to assess and enhance prior selection in physics-based Bayesian turbulence uncertainty quantification using random matrix theory insights.
Findings
Perturbations of shape parameters are normally distributed for maximum entropy.
Turbulence kinetic energy perturbations should be log-normal.
Guidance on variance magnitudes for physical variables to achieve maximum entropy.
Abstract
Numerical models based on Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are widely used in engineering turbulence modeling. However, the RANS predictions have large model-form uncertainties for many complex flows. Quantification of these large uncertainties originating from the modeled Reynolds stresses has attracted attention in turbulence modeling community. Recently, a physics-based Bayesian framework for quantifying model-form uncertainties has been proposed with successful applications to several flows. Nonetheless, how to specify proper priors without introducing unwarranted, artificial information remains challenging to the current form of the physics-based approach. Another recently proposed method based on random matrix theory provides the prior distributions with the maximum entropy, which is an alternative for model-form uncertainty quantification in RANS simulations. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
