Near-side azimuthal and pseudorapidity correlations using neutral strange baryons and mesons in d+Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: B. Abelev, L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G., Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, A. Aparin, D. Arkhipkin,, E. C. Aschenauer, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, X. Bai, V. Bairathi, L. S., Barnby, R. Bellwied, A. Bhasin, A. K. Bhati, P. Bhattarai

TL;DR
This study measures near-side di-hadron correlations involving neutral strange baryons and mesons in various heavy-ion collisions at 200 GeV to explore flavor and baryon/meson dependence of jet-like correlations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of neutral strange particle correlations in different collision systems, revealing discrepancies with PYTHIA predictions for particle composition.
Findings
Jet-like correlations show a narrow peak in azimuth and pseudorapidity.
Strange particle composition in jet-like correlations differs from PYTHIA predictions.
Unidentified particle yields are well modeled by PYTHIA, unlike strange particle composition.
Abstract
We present measurements of the near-side of triggered di-hadron correlations using neutral strange baryons (, ) and mesons () at intermediate transverse momentum (3 6 GeV/) to look for possible flavor and baryon/meson dependence. This study is performed in +Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV measured by the STAR experiment at RHIC. The near-side di-hadron correlation contains two structures, a peak which is narrow in azimuth and pseudorapidity consistent with correlations due to jet fragmentation, and a correlation in azimuth which is broad in pseudorapidity. The particle composition of the jet-like correlation is determined using identified associated particles. The dependence of the conditional yield of the jet-like correlation on the trigger particle momentum, associated particle momentum, and centrality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
