
TL;DR
This paper explores two different definitions of a functor from Chow motives to numerical motives, analyzing their properties and differences in the context of Voevodsky's motives.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two natural definitions of the quotient functor, highlighting their distinct properties and implications in motive theory.
Findings
The two functors are fundamentally different in behavior.
One functor is full and conservative, while the other is not.
The study clarifies the conditions under which these functors preserve structures.
Abstract
We study mixed versions of the classical quotient functor from Chow motives to numerical motives. We compare two natural definitions, which turn out to be very different. We investigate fullness, conservativity and exactness of these two functors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
