A Short Note on Infinite Union/Intersection of Omega Regular Languages
Wanwei Liu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that omega regular languages are not closed under infinite union and intersection, and explores adding quantifiers to temporal logics to increase expressiveness, which leads to undecidability issues.
Contribution
It reveals the limitations of omega regular languages under infinite operations and proposes an extension to temporal logic, highlighting the trade-off between expressiveness and decidability.
Findings
Omega regular languages are not closed under infinite union and intersection.
Adding quantifiers to temporal logic increases expressiveness but causes undecidability.
The undecidability persists even in limited fragments of the extended logic.
Abstract
We in this paper show that omega regular languages are not closed under infinite union and intersection. As an attempt, we propose to add step variables and quantifiers to temporal logics to enhance the expressiveness of the underlying logic. We also show that doing this would cause undecidability in satisfiability, even if for a rather limited fragment of temporal logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Logic, programming, and type systems · Formal Methods in Verification
